Voter Photo ID Amendment Goes before MN Supreme Court
Read briefs in the legal battle over keeping the amendment on the ballot.
Minnesota Supreme Court Justice Paul Anderson
UpTake
Photos (1)
Photos
Pdfs (9)
Pdfs
The Minnesota Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday addressing whether the ballot question for this November's "voter photo ID” amendment is misleading.
You can read briefs filed in the case online by clicking on the PDF thumbnails. More court documents are at the Minnesota Supreme Court website.
An opinion from the justices could come next month.
What do you think? Leave a comment below.
Edward
2:30 am on Friday, July 20, 2012
http://www.politico.com/wuerker/2012/05/political-cartoons-may-2012/000109-001369.html
Interesting how Republicans want you to show photo ID to vote once -- but want to hide identities of single people who want to spend hundreds of millions of dollars influencing the general public
Terry Elliott
7:47 am on Friday, July 20, 2012
Voting rights should be protected, hence the amendment. Free speech rights, including freedom of association, should be protected, hence the 1st amendment.
santa
6:55 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate level appellate courts. Thanks.
http://easyforextrading.us/revealing-no-fuss-copywriting-guides-programs.html | argan oil images
fgfd
6:56 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012
This is the most common step in the process towards the Supreme Court. Most cases originate in a District or a Federal Court when the party who does not prevail believes a higher court will rule differently. Thanks.
Regards,
http://pennsouthnews.com/the-healing-qualities-of-moroccan-oil-when-you-really-cant-manage-the-kind-of-hair-you-have-you-can-simply-make-use-of-the-moroccan-oil-this-one-can-take-care-of-all-hair-damages-and-support/ | argan oil moisture repair shampoo